Skip to main content

OBERTO conference

Throughout this summer, there have been many debates and flare-ups in the press and on social media surrounding opera. The controversies and resulting soul-searching and argument fluctuated wildly between those who felt a sense of doom and gloom and those eager to be optimistic - sometimes, in my view, with a touch of delusion - about the future and what was good about the developments occurring in the industry.

It was interesting, then, to attend the OBERTO conference at Oxford Brookes University yesterday, where an impressive collection of academics and opera professionals delivered papers on a variety of issues and subjects based around the issue of accessibility, access and the age old matter of opera's reputation. You can be sure that the word "elitism" came up quite a bit. Throughout the day, the well constructed programme tried to encapsulate and rationalise the varying pillars of the operatic firmament that occupy all of us ceaselessly. These included crossover artists, the concept of elitism (both of the art form itself and its accoutrements), the history of opera in this country, the modernism debate, marketing and social media. Even Britain's Got Talent and its habit of throwing up "opera acts" got a look in (and a very fascinating dissection it was too!) Education and reassessing audiences was there and it was in this section I gave a paper (which wasn't terribly optimistic, if I am honest). You can see the full programme here

I'm not going to give a full summary of what everybody said in what was without exception a set of papers that gave much insight and revealed some extremely interesting facts and ideas for consideration. It was difficult not to reflect on my own educational shortcomings in a room full of such clever people but that's a purely personal impression. Discussion was lively and heartfelt and surprisingly didn't descend into the sort of whining we are all guilty of from time to time. Undeniably, there was a sense of an industry under attack, misunderstood, caricatured and overly scrutinised with delegates offering lots of stories that we could all identify with. It takes time to absorb and consider everything we heard but I have certainly come away with a few ideas to work with. But despite the unquestionable angst that exists within our industry, it wasn't in the least lacking in constructive dialogue or intelligent examination of the issues. I was also struck by how many capable and dedicated young people are working in both the industry and related academia.

Not everybody agreed at all times of course and I am sure we all came away with different impressions of where the business is and where it is going. Indeed, one strong theme for me was that in fact, we are not quite sure where we are going yet and that opera is in a form of transition. Reassuringly, it appears we are all at least aware of a) that fact b) what the unresolved issues are (digital, education, access) and that the talent exists to react as and when necessary.

I may publish my paper on these pages but of all the discussions, I probably delivered the most pessimistic but, paradoxically, what I think is the greatest problem is possibly the simplest concept of them all; exposure to the art form at a young age. It became evident that I am turning into a bit of a Luddite as well. One writes these papers before hearing those before yours and as mine was the very last paper, I was conscious of how I was essentially telling all before me that they were wasting their time! But I didn't mean it to sound that way, even though I feel there is something of the truth in it.

In the final open discussion session, when topics began to narrow down into how irritated we can get with the way in which the world sees us, it fell to Rupert Christiansen to issue a rallying call, to pull us up short on what was starting to feel like overpowering negativity. The opera world in the UK is in a pretty decent place, he proposed. Perhaps, he suggested, we are not on the edge of an abyss and we should celebrate how strong the art form is here. It was difficult to disagree, despite the various reservations and worries we may individually have; since Rupert has a powerful medium in which to express such a view (he probably has already) it may well be a good starting point.

Congratulations to Alexandra Wilson and her colleagues for pulling together such an interesting and constructive gathering.


Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

New horizons

Today it was announced that on September 30th, 2020, I will be taking early retirement from my role at Opera Holland Park. Ernest Hemingway once said that 'retirement is the ugliest word in the language' and in recent months, as I contemplated my own, I have come to know what he meant. Even though it is merely a word to describe my departure from Opera Holland Park after thirty-one years, it does 'catch' a bit. Which brings me onto George Burns who said that 'retirement at sixty-five is ridiculous. When I was sixty-five I still had pimples.'  I still have metaphorical pimples and remain as childish as ever, so I'm sticking with George's philosophy.  I'm not retiring in the conventional sense. I am retiring from Opera Holland Park, a formal, recognised conclusion of a life's work. It says 'my work here is done', not that my working life is. There are one or two big projects still in me. I am grateful to the board for allowing me t…

The best laid plans....

I had it all planned. Tonight would have been the 31st opening night of my Opera Holland Park career. And my last, too. I retire from the company on the 30th September this year and I had intended to use the ten weeks of music-making and the conviviality for which the venue is famed as a backdrop to say an awful lot of farewells. Those after show drinks, served in coup, flute and miniature and usually filled with a concoction of James Clutton's invention will be no more. Anxious looks at the weather forecast are gone too (not a loss) but most of all, I have been shorn of the chance to celebrate with all the team after each – always different – adrenalin filled night of wonderment; committed professionals who, like the singers who come off the stage, are crackling with the release of the night's pressures, having made a contribution to the enrichment of a thousand people. After all, that is the particular elixir we crave and it is why we do it.
I'm not dwelling too much on th…

The Oxbridge divide

In the past couple of weeks the issue of privilege and the Oxbridge divide has been prominent on social media. The argument has essentially been that Oxbridge caters most to the privileged and monied, and further, excludes black students in particular. David Lammy extracted some data from Oxford which he believes shows Oxford is not doing well enough with respect to offering access to bright black and underprivileged students. I am not sure if he is suggesting Oxford is institutionally racist but the inference that Oxford actively excludes black and disadvantaged students is easy to draw from his comments on the matter. The statistics are quite complex and to me don't actually suggest Oxford is doing too badly, but this thread of tweets addresses the specifics very well;

To be frank, I am not entirely sure where to start with this discussion because those progressing the arguments against elite universities appear to misunderst…