Skip to main content

Lawks a mercy! Cheaper prices!

A while ago, I wrote about the need for a recalibration of expectations when it comes to pricing of tickets. I said that we would be doing our bit by trying to bring forward prices that might help that process.

Take a look at the link below, which takes you to our seat and price plan for 2015

Price plan 2015

Many of you will notice, before anything else, I suspect, that our Inspire seats have increased by £2. I also expect this might make some of you cross. But you should go on to notice that we have reduced all of our other prices, except for Aida which remains the same as prices in 2014. Some have reduced by up to 28%.  Before anybody points out that rarities and "harder sells" benefit most, I would remind them that when we last produced L'amore dei tre Re in the same capacity theatre, we were very close to adding an extra performance.

As many of our patrons come to more than one show, in groups, these reductions represent quite a significant collective saving.

The piece I referred to above addressed the issue of audience expectation and the habit of waiting for discounts. OHP has for years been achieving season capacities in the high nineties percentage so it isn't one of our driving issues, but there is no question that our patrons felt the pinch in 2014 - we conducted extensive research into it and the results were pretty clear. This is our response to that.

Of course, this then begs the question of the rise in the Inspire seats. Accessible pricing throughout the arts world is a common thing now, but we give around ten percent of our seats at £17 or entirely free. This has become something of a "given" at OHP and what is often forgotten is that the £17 seats are subsidised, decent seats, as opposed to cheap, "bad" seats.  Accessibility is what we are famed for of course, but that doesn't make us immune to criticism, nor does it attract particular praise or recognition either; ironically people still attack OHP for elitism or accuse us of corporate cronyism.

The Inspire and free seats for young and old are increasingly difficult to provide and recruit sponsors for and we try to find ways to adapt the business model to maintain them. Obviously, if a generous soul out there wants to chuck some dosh into the pot, we will welcome that! Bringing the lowest and highest prices closer together is one way of adapting our financial plans because it means, we hope, that more people will visit more often - there is nothing secretive about that. Equally, the issue of  ticket discounting is one that the industry has to address, and we will be conducting no such discounting in 2015. The idea, I suppose, is that we offer a fair deal for a fair product: I am sure we can find plenty of examples of entertainment that costs far more, but isn't criticised for it.
Kate Bush at £130 a pop, anyone?
Footnote; in case there is any suspicion that the increase in Inspire pays for the other discounts....the value of income from the price rise in Inspire seats equates to approximately £4,000. For the red seat category in Trittico alone, the reduction equates to around £8,000. Multiply that across the whole range and season and you will realise these are real reductions.


Popular posts from this blog

Panic! Culture and the working class

A new report on the working class relationship with culture has been doing the rounds recently.
Panic! Social Class, Taste and Inequalities in the Creative Industries (which you can find here ( comes at the issue from the point of view of the working class and their opportunities to find careers in the cultural sector. I usually concern myself most with the audience aspects of this debate but this report does touch on matters that relate to that, too. The general issue was also recently making waves with respect to entrants into Oxbridge and with Owen Jones's huge Twitter spat about the class of those in the media. 
The Panic! report takes data from various sources and draws conclusions from it. Some of the conclusions are based on what appear to me to be oddly skewed impressions and some of the report sounds like an argument looking for a validation, rather t…

Emma Dent Coad - putting the record straight

Kensington MP Emma Dent Coad has again used OHP as a tool in her battles against RBKC. This piece once again quotes figures that are manifestly untrue.

The first time she quoted these figures was in her 'After Grenfell' paper on poverty. A great deal of misinformation has been circulated regarding OHP's costs over the years and the amount of money the council spent. Inflating, misreporting and dramatising the cost of supporting public arts only adds to the sense of outrage, increasing the climate of fear around local authority support for culture. When these arguments appear, little reference is made to expenditure on other services the council provides. We are an easy target.

Emma Dent-Coad's "After Grenfell" paper tied OHP to the disaster and quoted a FOI report from RBKC that purportedly revealed the council had spent "£30 million over 15 years" on the…

The Oxbridge divide

In the past couple of weeks the issue of privilege and the Oxbridge divide has been prominent on social media. The argument has essentially been that Oxbridge caters most to the privileged and monied, and further, excludes black students in particular. David Lammy extracted some data from Oxford which he believes shows Oxford is not doing well enough with respect to offering access to bright black and underprivileged students. I am not sure if he is suggesting Oxford is institutionally racist but the inference that Oxford actively excludes black and disadvantaged students is easy to draw from his comments on the matter. The statistics are quite complex and to me don't actually suggest Oxford is doing too badly, but this thread of tweets addresses the specifics very well;

To be frank, I am not entirely sure where to start with this discussion because those progressing the arguments against elite universities appear to misunderst…