Skip to main content

Lawks a mercy! Cheaper prices!


A while ago, I wrote about the need for a recalibration of expectations when it comes to pricing of tickets. I said that we would be doing our bit by trying to bring forward prices that might help that process.

Take a look at the link below, which takes you to our seat and price plan for 2015

Price plan 2015

Many of you will notice, before anything else, I suspect, that our Inspire seats have increased by £2. I also expect this might make some of you cross. But you should go on to notice that we have reduced all of our other prices, except for Aida which remains the same as prices in 2014. Some have reduced by up to 28%.  Before anybody points out that rarities and "harder sells" benefit most, I would remind them that when we last produced L'amore dei tre Re in the same capacity theatre, we were very close to adding an extra performance.

As many of our patrons come to more than one show, in groups, these reductions represent quite a significant collective saving.

The piece I referred to above addressed the issue of audience expectation and the habit of waiting for discounts. OHP has for years been achieving season capacities in the high nineties percentage so it isn't one of our driving issues, but there is no question that our patrons felt the pinch in 2014 - we conducted extensive research into it and the results were pretty clear. This is our response to that.

Of course, this then begs the question of the rise in the Inspire seats. Accessible pricing throughout the arts world is a common thing now, but we give around ten percent of our seats at £17 or entirely free. This has become something of a "given" at OHP and what is often forgotten is that the £17 seats are subsidised, decent seats, as opposed to cheap, "bad" seats.  Accessibility is what we are famed for of course, but that doesn't make us immune to criticism, nor does it attract particular praise or recognition either; ironically people still attack OHP for elitism or accuse us of corporate cronyism.

The Inspire and free seats for young and old are increasingly difficult to provide and recruit sponsors for and we try to find ways to adapt the business model to maintain them. Obviously, if a generous soul out there wants to chuck some dosh into the pot, we will welcome that! Bringing the lowest and highest prices closer together is one way of adapting our financial plans because it means, we hope, that more people will visit more often - there is nothing secretive about that. Equally, the issue of  ticket discounting is one that the industry has to address, and we will be conducting no such discounting in 2015. The idea, I suppose, is that we offer a fair deal for a fair product: I am sure we can find plenty of examples of entertainment that costs far more, but isn't criticised for it.
Kate Bush at £130 a pop, anyone?
Footnote; in case there is any suspicion that the increase in Inspire pays for the other discounts....the value of income from the price rise in Inspire seats equates to approximately £4,000. For the red seat category in Trittico alone, the reduction equates to around £8,000. Multiply that across the whole range and season and you will realise these are real reductions.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Audiences will decide the future of opera

I have news: the audience will decide the future of opera.
When our season at Opera Holland Park comes to an end, I pore over spreadsheets trying to find reasons why our audience have behaved in the way that they have, and the most concentrated analysis tends to come after seasons during which our house has been full. The theory is this; if we have underperformed, we are programmed to find solutions, but if we have performed well, we are less likely to look for the gremlins that might lose us that ever-capricious audience in a trice – you are never more vulnerable than when you are successful.  Sometimes, though, one can miss the obvious, or perhaps ignore it.
In nearly three decades in opera, I have experienced one "boom" in the art form but an almost perpetual "crisis" of confidence, an alarmed perma-reflection on whether we remain relevant as an art form. This introspective brew is spiced by the occasional real crisis, like that recently at ENO, but we never reall…

XTC -This is Pop (Documentary, Sky 1)

The long awaited - and even longer overdue - documentary about the British band XTC felt to many of us who have considered them the best ever group to emerge from these shores, like a simultaneous roar of approval and a shocking great slap in the face, a sharp reminder of what we have lost now that they no longer record together. Apple Venus Vol.1 and Wasp Star (Apple Venus Vol. 2) were released in 1999 and 2000 respectively and together represented the almost perfect distillation of British popular music. I hesitate to just call it "pop" although there are almost unequalled examples of it on both these albums and right through the XTC canon. Andy Partridge's lavishly inventive songwriting, lyrical brilliance and at times almost extra-terrestrial knack for a breathtaking melody or crushingly beautiful harmony seemed to improve and grow throughout the band's 14 album career. It came to a mighty zenith on those final two records. 
Followers of XTC were often torn betwee…

Panic! Culture and the working class

A new report on the working class relationship with culture has been doing the rounds recently.
Panic! Social Class, Taste and Inequalities in the Creative Industries (which you can find here (http://createlondon.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Panic-Social-Class-Taste-and-Inequalities-in-the-Creative-Industries1.pdf) comes at the issue from the point of view of the working class and their opportunities to find careers in the cultural sector. I usually concern myself most with the audience aspects of this debate but this report does touch on matters that relate to that, too. The general issue was also recently making waves with respect to entrants into Oxbridge and with Owen Jones's huge Twitter spat about the class of those in the media. 
The Panic! report takes data from various sources and draws conclusions from it. Some of the conclusions are based on what appear to me to be oddly skewed impressions and some of the report sounds like an argument looking for a validation, rather t…