Skip to main content

Thought(s) for the day; some things never change

During the months of recent self-examination by the opera world and its constant battles with itself and others, it has been easy to forget about the art itself. I do think that in the operatic firmament, there is a great deal wrong (about which, more soon, elsewhere) and at times it can feel quite apocalyptic but there goes along with that a feeling that whatever "problems" exist, they are temporary, cyclical. I suppose we should know relatively soon towards what fate we are all striding, at turns bellicose and defiant, or anxious, self-regarding, timid and supplicant to the great combined Gods of digital and one dimensional new-audience gratification. Paddy Power should open a book.

But what has certainly struck me recently after watching several rehearsals and performances is just how unchanged the art form is on a very simple level. After 25 years of doing it, I am aware that opera is just the same, provokes the same emotions, the same concerns, the same cynical examinations, tastes and professional judgements. I am not talking about the modernisation of productions (after all, we had a production at Holland Park nearly 23 years ago that had Trovatore set in the streets of Belfast) but the simple, visceral concepts, disciplines and effects of opera. I am aware there is no great profundity in this realisation, which is sort of the point.

Unquestionably, there seems to be a school of thought that "singers were better" in the "old days" and nostalgia persists in audience thinking. Yet, we still sit in the theatre and think the very same things we thought years ago about a particular singer, or conductor, director or even individual orchestral players. One still recoils at a particular vocal tone that has its foundation in technical deficiencies that existed 100 years ago, too; you can still hear a bloom (or not) in a voice at roughly the same age as one did decades ago; it is still possible to melt at pictures painted on a stage by a director and his designer or cringe at those you wish they hadn't. As with committed long-time audience members, the ear is trained, refined, able to hear nuance, layers of sound, the vocal inflections and weaknesses and this is of course why we argue so vehemently about certain cross-over artists who we insist are not opera singers. We don't do that because we are snobs, but usually because we know the difference. And the things that make "real" opera singers different are the same as they have been for all time.

Theatrical believability has become a powerful, positive force in opera in the last couple of decades (a discernible change if there is one) and that has given us many interesting things to praise, argue, gnash and snarl about, but opera hasn't really changed that much has it? It may sound counter-intuitive but by bringing theatrical believability and pungency to operatic stages, we have given the thrill of the voice and its age-old manner a new and scintillating context. I would argue we can identify huge developments in television production and styles, in acting itself even, theatrical writing, pop music. But not so in opera - perhaps a loosening of censorious instincts? - and amid the gloom, that should give us more hope than concern. Moreover, we shouldn't be afraid of the foundations that remain either.


Popular posts from this blog

Panic! Culture and the working class

A new report on the working class relationship with culture has been doing the rounds recently.
Panic! Social Class, Taste and Inequalities in the Creative Industries (which you can find here ( comes at the issue from the point of view of the working class and their opportunities to find careers in the cultural sector. I usually concern myself most with the audience aspects of this debate but this report does touch on matters that relate to that, too. The general issue was also recently making waves with respect to entrants into Oxbridge and with Owen Jones's huge Twitter spat about the class of those in the media. 
The Panic! report takes data from various sources and draws conclusions from it. Some of the conclusions are based on what appear to me to be oddly skewed impressions and some of the report sounds like an argument looking for a validation, rather t…

Emma Dent Coad - putting the record straight

Kensington MP Emma Dent Coad has again used OHP as a tool in her battles against RBKC. This piece once again quotes figures that are manifestly untrue.

The first time she quoted these figures was in her 'After Grenfell' paper on poverty. A great deal of misinformation has been circulated regarding OHP's costs over the years and the amount of money the council spent. Inflating, misreporting and dramatising the cost of supporting public arts only adds to the sense of outrage, increasing the climate of fear around local authority support for culture. When these arguments appear, little reference is made to expenditure on other services the council provides. We are an easy target.

Emma Dent-Coad's "After Grenfell" paper tied OHP to the disaster and quoted a FOI report from RBKC that purportedly revealed the council had spent "£30 million over 15 years" on the…

The Oxbridge divide

In the past couple of weeks the issue of privilege and the Oxbridge divide has been prominent on social media. The argument has essentially been that Oxbridge caters most to the privileged and monied, and further, excludes black students in particular. David Lammy extracted some data from Oxford which he believes shows Oxford is not doing well enough with respect to offering access to bright black and underprivileged students. I am not sure if he is suggesting Oxford is institutionally racist but the inference that Oxford actively excludes black and disadvantaged students is easy to draw from his comments on the matter. The statistics are quite complex and to me don't actually suggest Oxford is doing too badly, but this thread of tweets addresses the specifics very well;

To be frank, I am not entirely sure where to start with this discussion because those progressing the arguments against elite universities appear to misunderst…