Skip to main content

My name is Jose Mourinho, and I'm not Special (at the moment)


.....The words that Jose Mourinho needs to utter to himself, the reality he has to face in order to change himself and the fortunes of his team. Such a recalibration of self-image won't be easy for a man who frequently embroiders his press conferences with 'I' and 'My' and references to his past achievements. He is a winner, not a loser and as such won't take easily to his new role, one that has to feature a cold-eyed acceptance that his magic, such as it is, has been diluted. 

Mourinho is an egomaniac - not unlike many successful people - but he has an edge of narcissism that makes it difficult for him to see the success of his teams through any prism but his own greatness. When his club wins, "I" win. So when things are not as they should be, Jose takes it personally, as an affront to him, an insult, he is embarrassed. He'll take it out on players, make grand gestures by dropping his best, and he'll search for outside influences - excuses - for his difficulties. He spent much of last season blaming the fans, too. I have never really bought into this idea that Jose is playing mind games with his antics, protecting his players and taking pressure off them. I just think he means all of it: the persecution complex, the battles with the media. 

I don't know what Jose says to the players on a daily basis and whether he is encouraging, critical, dismissive, helpful. As a Chelsea fan, it has been difficult to watch the catastrophic decline of a team who won the Premiership relatively easily just a few months ago, but it has been more bewildering to watch the public disintegration of Mourinho as he throws punches in his defence against real or imagined foes. The old theory that his methods diminish rapidly after two or three seasons is an easy one to fall back on but is nevertheless hard to dismiss entirely. My own impression is that his team have seen him crumble a little and that glimpse of weakness, tinged as it undoubtedly will be with vituperative recrimination internally, is not attracting sympathy from his players, or a sense that they want to help him. Chelsea fans have been quick to point out in recent matches that the team appear to be playing for Mourinho, but are not getting the breaks; I think they are playing for themselves, pulling together as best they can for their own sakes, yet endeavour alone is about as useful as a chocolate teapot right now.

Which suggests that if Mourinho is to revive his aura, he will either need a new set of players upon whom he can work his magic, or a new club. Unless, that is, he admits to himself that whatever it was that worked for him as he breezed triumphantly into various cities, hoovering up medals and then departing, will need tweaking if he is to build longer lasting dynasties. Part of that process is to admit he has got some things wrong, that despite some justifiable grievances with the FA and referees, nobody else is going to do it for him; there is no power above who will deliver justice. Jose Mourinho is down among the also-rans and past glories don't change that reality, which means humility, creativity, bravery to change things and, above all, acquiescence to the uncomfortable concept that his players are actually people he needs, rather than the other way around. 

Chelsea fans, who are among the quickest to want a manager dismissed and who can usually find any number of reasons why an unpopular manager is failing are supporting Mourinho, convinced, as the man himself is, that the problems don't begin with him, but are in fact the failures of the players. When Avram Grant took Chelsea to the Champions League final, it was all down to the efforts of the players, when AVB struggled, it was because he was incompetent; football fans can have it as many ways as it suits them. Mourinho's history at Chelsea buys him grace, but it may be fruitless because whilst it remains true that the club has little option right now, and must hope Jose can effect a reversal of fortunes, I just don't think he looks capable of it. We all hope that I am wrong, and, unlike Jose hitherto, I will be happy to admit it.

Comments

  1. Very good article. Personality I'm convinced that Jose's arrogance is the problem and the reason why he tends to have only short term success at clubs. It's funny how all the insults heaped at his fellow managers over the years are all coming back to haunt him. Who's the specialist in failure now? Sorry but he has to go, there's no other way. I know fans in England adore him, but Chelsea is a global brand now, and the image of the club has been in the gutter all season.

    It's one thing to have poor results but the PR is toxic right now, and most of this is due to manager's antics all season. When you're the 2nd highest paid manager in the world and you take an incredibly talented squad close to relegation, then it's time to resign.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brilliant read Mike. Mourinho has to go in my view. He hasn't delivered on any of the promises he made since he was appointed in June 2013 and I haven't seen any real progression from us as a side despite winning the league at a canter last season (which IMO was more down to the poor quality of the league itself than us).

    Keeping Mourinho is an option but you'd have to essentially overhaul the entire squad and spend circa £300m then repeat the process again in 2/3 years when the next crop of players have grown bored of his short-term methods and off-the-field antics.

    The damage as a whole Mourinho has done to the club is irreparable and I think we should just cut our losses and start over. The whole club is a circus at the minute and we've now become the biggest laughing stock not just in England, but in world football and arguably all of sport.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alot of the spending would come from player sales

    ReplyDelete
  4. Spiffing article Perillers, now I'm off to the jolly old opera, what ho, what ho.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gelb and The Met

Having posted a piece that was kind to critics and thus risking opprobrium from all quarters, I suppose I ought to be wary of writing a piece that is sympathetic to the current opera demon, Peter Gelb.  Let us be clear, I don't know what the detailed financial situation at the Met is, I don't know how its budgets are split and allocated, I don't know how much they spend on sets and productions. I just read selective figures used negatively and that is always something we should be wary of.  What Gelb and the Met are going through is probably entirely unique in the opera world given the scale of economics involved and the accusations of mismanagement that are being thrown around are hard to reconcile with some of the realities; it is certainly true, for example, that Gelb has taken the Met's turnover from $222 million to over $300 million in eight years which doesn't immediately suggest mismanagement, but that is as glib and superficial an analysis as anything else I

Honorary Doctorate acceptance speech

I have been asked for the text of my acceptance speech from the graduation ceremony at Oxford Brookes University, 20th June, 2016. The audience was 170 graduates, in various arts, performing, publishing and other creative disciplines, as well as hundreds of their family members. My intention was to confirm that in an age of undervalued arts education, their choices were the correct ones; that despite the prevailing desire of the government for more engineers, mathematicians and computer experts, their talents would come to be as valued as any others. ----------- It is with great surprise and pleasure that I come here today to accept this honorary doctorate, the giving of which is met with more pride than I can actually express. To be recognised by an academic institution is not something I ever thought possible as I grew up. My two oldest children have achieved far more than I have in academia, but, as a competitive Dad I just want to say to them…erm, Doctor?! I am also honoured

Sometimes, facts really don't matter to people

Since the Brexit vote, and especially since the recent Autumn statement, there has been something familiar nagging at me; the remarkable refusal of Brexiters to accept or acknowledge the facts set out by the government and in the OBR's forecasts. It reminds me of something, a feeling I have had before. I know that the expression post-truth annoys a lot of people, but it is a thing, it really exists. People, for whatever reason can knowingly refuse to accept bare facts when it suits them. It isn't a new phenomenon at all. I am bound to say, moreover, that I have tended to experience it in a malign sense, when the things people want to believe are unconscionable or driven by prejudice of one kind or another. Last night I remembered where it was that I had last seen the phenomenon and it was an experience that left me astonished at the time, but which also provoked in me a genuine disgust for my fellow citizens. I am afraid it is an unpleasant parallel scenario, but it was pro